EclectEcon

Economics and the mid-life crisis have much in common: Both dwell on foregone opportunities

C'est la vie; c'est la guerre; c'est la pomme de terre                                     A View from/of the Econochasm by John Palmer

Richard Posner deserves the next Nobel Prize in Economics
Please consider using these links if you are ordering from Amazon: Amazon.com, Amazon.ca, Amazon.uk

<< main
Rules for Palestinians
In anticipation of the upcoming Annapolis Conference and preliminary peace talks, it is good to keep the following points in mind, by Barry Rubin [h/t to former student, AlanP]:
1. Palestinians cannot stop other Palestinians from attacking Israel. To do so would be betraying the cause, becoming Israel's lackey. This applies even if the Israelis are bringing in supplies or providing jobs to Palestinians, or if the attack damages Palestinian interests. If the victims are schoolchildren or shoppers or people riding on a bus, of course, is irrelevant in this world view.

2. He who is most militant is always right. Extremism equals heroism. This is one reason why Fatah has such a difficult time competing with Hamas. It cannot denounce these rivals for being too hardline and intransigent. Suicide bombers along with those who incite and manage them are role models, not misled individuals, much less evil ones.

3. More violence is good and a victory if it inflicts casualties or damage on Israel. Other than ritual denunciations for the foreign media, these are matters for pride, with the implication being that they advance the cause rather than sabotage it.

4. No Israeli government can do anything good. Thus, Olmert is no better than anyone else even as he withdraws from the Gaza Strip, offers to accept a Palestinian state, and is ready to give up east Jerusalem. Some Palestinian leaders can talk privately to Israeli counterparts about cooperation and even their dream of peace but don't tell this to their own people.

5. Since Palestinians are the perpetual victim they are entitled to everything they want and never need to give anything in exchange for Israeli concessions. Thus, the preferred PA diplomatic option is that Israel withdraws from the West Bank and east Jerusalem, recognizes an independent Palestinian state, releases all Palestinian prisoners, and then talks can begin. (Note: I thought of this as a satire but a high-ranking Syrian official just proposed the equivalent on that front.)

6. No Palestinian should be imprisoned for attacks on Israel one minute longer than required by international public relations' needs. After all, if they are doing heroic deeds against an evil enemy — even by murdering civilians on purpose — why should they be punished?

7. Fatah won't discipline or expel anyone for launching attacks.

8. Wiping Israel off the map is morally correct. If anyone says anything different they will be scared or ashamed, justifying their lapse as a temporary tactical measure or way to fool enemies.

9. While pretending to be nationalist, the movement sets as top priority the so-called "right of return," the demand that all Palestinian refugees or their descendents — several million people — must be allowed to live in Israel. It is better not to get a state than to give up this demand. Even though having many Palestinians go live in Israel would make Palestine weaker and poorer it is better to focus on destroying Israel from within.

10. It is more important to be steadfast and patient with a terrible status quo than to make big gains by ending the conflict forever. To do so would give up future Palestinians' chance to seek total victory. Their right to all of the land cannot be given away.

11. No speeches, no foreign aid, and no international plans or meetings have altered these basic rules. Palestinian leaders may sincerely voice their dismay with this problem privately but won't fight to smash them. If they ever really do change we'll know. But until then, these are the reasons why the Palestinian side cannot and will not reach for peace or keep existing commitments very well. Even if a handful of top Palestinians want to reach agreement with Israel, they cannot — and even worse, dare not — violate these commandments.




Category: Middle East Posted on Friday, November 2, 2007 at 1:21am
<< main






To leave a comment, please post as "guest"
Richard Kulisz (mail) (www):
Other than a couple minor points, I agree with you and I agree it's fucked up. More than you, I'm aware of the psychological underpinnings of this fucked up worldview. However, these are the points you are wrong about:

While pretending to be nationalist, the movement sets as top priority the so-called "right of return," the demand that all Palestinian refugees or their descendents — several million people — must be allowed to live in Israel. It is better not to get a state than to give up this demand.


Here you are really displaying your ignorance of basic political theory. A country is a geopolitical entity, a state is a political hierarchy, and a nation is a people. So of course Palestinian nationalists are going to care more about the right of return than they would about a country or a state. They do so by definition. Nevermind the fact that if Palestine were a country, it would be entirely non-viable with the Israelis as neighbours stealing all their resources. And if it were a state then it would be a pathetically weak one, enslaved to Israel.


Their right to all of the land cannot be given away.


It really can't. If it could, it wouldn't be a right. Pretending to give it away would be falsehood.


until then, these are the reasons why the Palestinian side cannot and will not reach for peace or keep existing commitments very well.


Here you seem to be ignoring history. Before Israel blatantly provoked Hamas by murdering Palestinians as a precursor for a clampdown, Hamas was keeping the peace. At great cost to its own credibility no less since it received nothing from Israel for it.

Palestinians are capable of keeping the peace when it suits them. Israelis however are not since a permanent state of war is a precondition of the Israeli military-industrial-university-government ... oh wait, I think there's a word for this and the word is Fascism.

It takes two to have peace. Even if Palestinians gave up all arms, Israel would still seek to ethnically cleanse or genocide them. And this is by the Israelis' own admission.
11.2.2007 3:49am
cba:

Israel would still seek to ethnically cleanse or genocide them

And yet somehow the Palestinian population keeps growing and growing.

Israel is clearly the most inefficient ethnic cleanser/genocider in the history of the universe.
11.2.2007 9:09pm
© 2005