EclectEcon

Economics and the mid-life crisis have much in common: Both dwell on foregone opportunities

C'est la vie; c'est la guerre; c'est la pomme de terre                                     A View from/of the Econochasm by John Palmer

Richard Posner deserves the next Nobel Prize in Economics
Please consider using these links if you are ordering from Amazon: Amazon.com, Amazon.ca, Amazon.uk

<< main
What Is the Price Elasticity of Demand for the NFL Network?
Gregg Easterbrook of ESPN knows. It's greater than one (in absolute value):
The NFL's insistence on asking too much for its channel is yet another example of how often big business, with zillions of dollars in executive-suite and economic-consultant spending, nevertheless acts as if it's ignorant of basic economics. To increase revenues, cut prices; this raises demand. (A high price suppresses demand.)
No, Gregg. If you cut prices, that will lead to an increase in the quantity demanded, not demand; if you cut prices, you move downward along the demand curve, you don't shift it.

And whether that will lead to an increase in the revenues for the firm depends on the price elasticity of demand. And it is not at all clear that the price elasticity of demand for NFL Network is greater than one.
Category: Economics, Sports Posted on Wednesday, November 28, 2007 at 8:36pm
<< main






To leave a comment, please post as "guest"
ThaddeusMcMonster:
If there is one thing that stuffy Canadian econ professors do to confuse the general public about economics, it's to publicly lecture people on the difference between quantity demanded and demand. While this distinction is very important in a freshman econ course, it is something that needs to be hammered in over a number of classes, otherwise the students simply won't get it. To say that raising the price will lower the demand of a good, while not technically correct, represents a useful simplification of the theory to the public.
11.28.2007 9:41pm
AspiringEconomist (mail) (www):
It's not a "useful simplification" when you argue that increasing prices will undoubtedly increase revenues. That just bad economics. Something that I am more than happy to have an insightful Canadian economist rectify.
11.29.2007 4:39pm
jeadie5 (mail):
The goal of NFLN is to get NFLN included in the basic cable package. The cable companies would like it to be a premium channel. The NFLN obviously gets basic economics as being part of basic cable will undoubtedly increase the quantity demanded (viewers) when compared to premium channels.

After all, it is the quantity of people watching that drives ad revenues, and those revenues could be much greater than anything the cable comapnies are paying to carry NFLN if they get the number of viewers ESPN gets for its NFL broadcasts.
11.30.2007 7:13pm
© 2005