We learned in the late 70s and 80s that we cannot sustain these low unemployment rates by continuing to inflate aggregate demand. Eventually the unemployment rates rise back toward their natural rates. This process of having our unemployment rates rise as we slide along the short-run Phillips Curve is not the same thing as an inadequate-aggregate-demand-induced recession; rather, it is a reversion to long-run equilibrium. Furthermore, any attempts to head off this reversion to the long-run are likely to be highly inflationary. Both the Fed and the Bank of Canada will have to be very careful not to over-inflate our economies in a futile attempt to reduce or hold unemployment below the natural rates.
Making things worse, it is likely that the long-run vertical Phillips Curve is shifting to the right (increasing the natural unemployment rate), at least temporarily, as the economies suffer some short-run aggregate supply shocks:
- The liquidity crisis is not just affecting aggregate demand; it is accompanied by a decline in the production of financial intermediation, a supply effect (cf Tyler Cowen, with thanks to Gabriel Mihalache).
- Rapid growth in the developing economies has led to a tremendous increase in their demand for commodities. This, in turn, means the prices of these goods are higher for North Americans, which has the same effect as any other supply shock in the economy [h/t to BrianF for this one].





Re: 1), it depends a lot on the degree to which companies need financial services to maintain their level of activity.
It would be interesting to find out if people can still finance their startups and if existing firms can get funding from major projects... Maybe some iliquidity in some exotic derivatives markets are not disturbing these deals. Maybe...